04/19/2007
|
#1
|
|
...
[10]
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 232
|
|
Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
|
|
|
04/19/2007
|
#3
|
|
...
[10]
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 232
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
| It's just from emails at the moment. Slow Roll was ranked 2nd because they took screen shots of Armory, in game, and of Standing in the Armory, and they all ahve them in second (I believe, maybe it was third) and then Blizzard just fucked them over. | |
|
|
|
04/19/2007
|
#4
|
|
Chocolate beats Paella
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,367
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#5
|
|
I like peaches
[10]
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 104
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
Who honestly didn't see something like this coming?
Blizzard has yet to get anything right since this game has been released. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#6
|
|
Forum Elite!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,062
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
Ya, I am in reckoning battlegroup with Slow Roll and PvE Clickers and Pro Up. (PvE Clickers and Pro Up are from my server). I don't think Pro Up is even going to be able to go. I am pretty sure I read somewhere that they can't go because they have people from Canada in their team, and Canada is included in the ineligible area.
Actually, the word is that in the reckoning battlegroup the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th teams were all DQed for various reasons. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#7
|
|
Hardcore Ultra Junkie!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
Even if your rating/ranking was high enough, to qualify your TEAM needs to be eligible. That means you must have 5 eligible players. People from Canada and some US states are not eligible. There are two issues here:
1. entire teams being DQd because of one member.
2. Inaccurate rating data being used.
Many of the teams DQ'd were done so well within the rules. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#8
|
|
I like peaches
[10]
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 104
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#9
|
|
Hardcore Ultra Junkie!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
| Canadians are not eligible because according to Canadian law this tournament is a form of gambling and gamblin is illegal in Canada. Or something like that. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#10
|
|
Worthless Holy Priest
[10]
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iluminati
Even if your rating/ranking was high enough, to qualify your TEAM needs to be eligible. That means you must have 5 eligible players. People from Canada and some US states are not eligible. There are two issues here:
1. entire teams being DQd because of one member.
2. Inaccurate rating data being used.
Many of the teams DQ'd were done so well within the rules.
|
Wish Blizzard would do something about the teams that cheated and still qualified, probably wont even look into the matter, they got enough on their plate as it is. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#11
|
|
...
[10]
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 232
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
1. PvE Clickers are fags. If anyone here is from them, fuck you.
2. At least 5 members from Slow Roll are elegible, and I believe 7 or 8 are in total.
Blizzard is fucked up, I don't get how they expect to have a decent tournament next season, but I know they will because everyone will say 'Hey all the serious team are boycotting, lets win this one.'
It's bull. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#12
|
|
Hardcore Ultra Junkie!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
| yes, blizz definitely messed up. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#13
|
|
Forum Elite!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,062
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kyre
1. PvE Clickers are fags. If anyone here is from them, fuck you.
2. At least 5 members from Slow Roll are elegible, and I believe 7 or 8 are in total.
Blizzard is fucked up, I don't get how they expect to have a decent tournament next season, but I know they will because everyone will say 'Hey all the serious team are boycotting, lets win this one.'
It's bull.
|
I actually don't really play anymore, but I have heard the stories about PvE Clickers from friends and it is pretty lame. But individually, a lot of them are pretty much the best pvpers on the server. Nition, Alchol and Michele are all top notch imo. | |
|
|
|
04/20/2007
|
#14
|
|
...
[10]
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 232
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
| They might be top notch, but that will never change the fact that they win-traded with their own guild to push themselves into the qualifiers. | |
|
|
|
04/23/2007
|
#15
|
|
I like peaches
[10]
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 104
|
|
Re: Qualifiers and giving teams the shaft.
| PvE Clickers should be DQ'd for having such a homosexual name. | |
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
| 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|
|